Sports in general have a variety of ways to publish and broadcast a news story. For instance ESPN has a way to cover a story in a different variations. The media that ESPN carries is that It has a website, an ESPN and it also has Television. The one that I feel is the most persistent is Television. The reason that I feel that way would be because the anchors have to be more objective during the live coverage. On radio coverage the broadcaster tends to be less biased and have their side of the story they see the story from. With that said the Internet is the less valued one when it comes to giving a neutral viewing. Unless its a blog, then the editor or journalist becomes then biased.
Personally, I like to hear the radio about a certain news story because the fact of hearing a broadcasters stand point is amazing to listen to. The difference between a radio covered story rather than a printed story, radio allow callers to phone in and make the case on what side they believe and argue the punishment or situation.
I rather watch a game then listen to one or read about one. You can see it for yourself and get your own opinion on the game itself
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that listening to the game on the radio is a good way to hear about certain stories. I like how callers can phone in and support their views on the radio. I also enjoy watching the game as well thought.
ReplyDeleteDo you ever notice that ESPN tends to be a little biased in their tv presentations as well? I find that they are very supportive of New England teams.
ReplyDelete